Wide Discourse Sound (W.D.S.)

Severe Dementia and High-Degree Autism-Spectrum-Like Phenomena Of Discourse

An Unfortunate Marked, Deep-Seated and Distinctive Hatred of the Scientific Method, And a Formidable Challenge Indeed

Perhaps The Psychiatric Establishment Needs to be Less Afraid to Diagnose and Diagnose *MORE* - Specifically on these points.

See also - This link

The following enumerates 18 universalistic moral principles to not do, such that the outcome is better.

Famously, the Old Testament lists 10 principles, many of which say "Thou Shalt Not".

These 18 things are "Thou Shalt Not"s, which, if applied and upheld, would lead to a better society.

The quotes here are verbatim quotes I heave experienced.

"Yeah, they haven't received much good press." - Guy in Western Canada

1) Obsessive attention to misinformation, disinformation or malinformation (M.D.M.) without the exercise of cognitive faculties to Disambiguate, Clarify or meta-awareness of the potential of the information being partial or M.D.M.

2) An obsessive desire to maintain the influence of any narrative on their minds that confuses matters more, a PR or propaganda obsession (but only if it's negative), a strange context-specific obsession to care about what the media says (even if the individual might disregard the media in other cases).

3) An obsessive desire to maintain the status quo.

(The following circumstance is true if and only if one grants validity to partial narratives and M.D.M. that has been propagated, such as books against organizations etc.

"Are they not very protective of their doctrine?" - Guy in Western Canada

4) General toleration of uncertainty about other groups.

5) Bias towards a given narrative (that they would be protective of).

6) Assuming things are secret.

"It is possible, but We could never do it, because it's so secret." - Guy in Western Canada

"Dianetics and the annihilation of thetons has been exposed by a lot of people who have left the community as a way to extract money while drip feeding the program over time." - Guy in Western Canada

See 6 - Assuming things are secret.

"exposed" - Guy in Western Canada

Extremely open. 99% of the material is available, you can torrent it. Extremely open. (And I said this at a secular group and they got overwhelmed and ran away.)

"community" - Guy in Western Canada

7) Organization-obsession. Assuming that Scientology is an organization, as opposed to definitionally, it is an applied religious philosophy (It got forced into a religious context for various reasons.) It is also a body of knowledge and findings, desperately and in an open-source fashion, begging to be tested and talked about. It is an applied body of knowledge or science.

8) Obsessive disrespect of anything in the context of Scientology or ANY science categorically. This manifests itself in COVID denialism, anti-science, etc. I heard someone say about the COVID lockdowns, etc. "This is not science! It is Scientology. It's not science." Here "thetan", the individual themselves, the consciousness of the individual that is capable of operating and doing things and creating, is being disrespected by misspelling the name, obsessively. Thetans are a basic principle in Scientology that everyone would learn on day 1 in a Scientology context (church, reading a book, scholarly, etc. - any context.)

9) Denialism of suffering / denialism of individual identity - A thetan in Scientology is a Life Unit, the individual. In Scientology, thetans have experienced a lot. It comes from the word "theta", which in Scientology means "life". Interestingly, in Greek, it means "death", but it can mean "life" in a variety of ways, and, indeed, "death", pre-assumes "life" for there to be "death" at all. (See interesting Quora article on this, if you want.) In Scientology, thetans have gone through a long duration of time in decline, the idea is that now, we should be smart and do actions that improve the condition of Thetans, life units, us, our consciousness, the awareness of awareness units. And inasmuch as the entire body of material from 1948 and 1950 onwards was unequivocally and defiantly open, it was trying to get talked, the entire body of material, in mainstream BioTech, psychiatry, psychology, biology, physics, and any and all branch of science. It is defiantly OPEN.

"as a way to extract money" - Guy in Western Canada

"It's all about money!" - Guy in Ottawa

10) Money whine. Debasing any discussion of a given topic. Instead of transactions being money for value, the value is obsessively omitted from the conception, leading to only ideas of money.

"drip feeding the program" - Guy in Western Canada

This is so delusional about secrecy that I cannot comprehend it. It is tantamount to a severe form of autism. I have no issues with people with Asperger's, but this is worse than most people with Asperger's or high-spectrum people. See 7, "Organization obsession" and "Money whine"

"over time" - Guy in Western Canada

11) Slow down narrative. Scientologists are IMPATIENT. Scientologists want things done, NOW. There is no "over time" in Scientology.

"Is that inaccurate?" - Guy in Western Canada

12) Fake desire for accuracy.

13) Fake representation of desire to have an accurate narrative. See first points (1 - 3)

"THAT is bullshit" - A guy in Ottawa who was running a secular meetup group who got overwhelmed right in the middle of the group when one member was humbly corrected, then awkwardly and in violation of all social mores ran away from his own group he was hosting. Then he started yelling into the air like a 3 year old for no reason. This is NORMAL behavior, not just for "secularists".

14) A desire to separate. Segregationism. Separationism. A desire to say "THAT" (as opposed to "this", or saying nothing)

"I am curious, you claim it's a free speech constraint that is preventing people from adopting Scientology's values. Isn't the onus on the messenger to deliver a compelling enough case and sufficient evidence to earn the adoption? In what way is there an imposition on your free speech?" - A guy in Western Canada

15) Onus delusion. Acting as if communication has not been done for 75 years. Acting as if, speech always gets listened to and internalized.

Another instance of "Obsessive disrespect of anything in the context of Scientology or ANY science categorically.", because the individual was thinking I was talking about Scientology's VALUES, when I was talking about the "mainstream scientific establishment".

This kind of quote is why Trump won/Trump "needed" to win (depending on the individual's perspective). This is show-off, alpha male, tough guy mindset. It acts as if there is someone who seems "strong" and the other people "have to" listen. This is a hidden support of authoritarianism. In reality, oftentimes in real life, there is someone trying to speak a message, but other people do not listen. Historically and in the current world, this is very, very normal, in all contexts.

"I am looking at it here. It's not hidden, it just suffers from a bad reputation."

See previous points.

"According to some, RLH made extreme claims of the potential capacity of a Clear. The claims never came to fruition and the church loved the goal posts."

"Also, the measures are all subjective, discounting it from standard scientific practice. "

My response:

"The initial Dianetic definition of Clear is high, yes. A clear in modern terminology is someone who doesn't have a reactive mind, one part of the case. There is more case besides just the reactive mind.

Also, the measures are not subjective. As for clear, that can be defined accurately. The person would lack the case that forms the reactive mind.

In regards to exteriorization and mental mass and a variety of other phenomena, those are empirical and reproducible.

I would say the initial Dianetic goal of clear was somewhat of an exaggeration as regards certain circumstances, but such might have been par for the course at the time to get attention. However, that was Dianetics. Once the greater expanse of spiritual existence was found, it became a new subject, Scientology. Of course, just as with the development of any body of knowledge, some earlier claims could be proven not 100% accurate. There is more memory than just the present life. And chronic pains and ailments could be solved, even for those who only believe in just one life and have a materialistic mindset, by addressing the broader scope of a beings spiritual existence. And as such, a new subject was formed, Scientology.

In no way, whatsoever, can it or should it be discounted from standard scientific practice. And in no way are there subjective or non reproducible criteria."

Notes

Another instance of "Obsessive disrespect of anything in the context of Scientology or ANY science categorically." (RLH) (See also, Tmoahs Eoidsn, and Siacs Netown, for instances of this pathology.)

16) Obsession of relativism versus Universalism. Declaration of things being subjective arbitrarily, when no subjectivity is part of the subject. Moreover, initial processes are literally called Objective processes, to increase objectivity (in this case in this context, such would mean a focus on the environment. In the context of science, objectivity would mean that something can be peer-reviewed and tested and found independent of previous findings, and that certain axioms and postulates are clear and universal.)

---

Putting these in a list here, these 16 principles are

Help me to Launch this Label and Break Systemic Communication Barriers & Widen Free Speech & Discourse - A Very Attainable, Tangible Goal.

I am Gregory Cohen and I'm a self-taught computer programmer and creator of a unique philosophical methodology who is also keen to business entrepreneurship and helping others to achieve success.

I have done a variety of roles in my life, including doing Artificial Intelligence work for a Private Branch Exchange (PBX) VoIP Company based in North Carolina.

I have also made websites for different entities. I know a variety of computer languages and have public code that is liked by hundreds of software developers.

As an aspiring entrepreneur, I have created many useful pieces of computer software, and have been involved in the formation of sales business along with many other business venture ideas.

As for music, I have a great love of all genres of music.

I have long been interested in rap and hip-hop music, along with a wide and eclectic taste in music in general.

I am a big fan of many popular music artists, such as Drake and Young Thug.

As I stated, I have long had an affinity for rap music, one of the most expressive genres that exist.

Latent in the genre is a great potential for human expression and human articulation - a great poetry rather unmatched.

I want to push boundaries and move things to the next level in expression. As such, it is time to start a new label to encourage this.

Sometimes, getting to where you want to go is a struggle. Indeed, I have been many places, heard many lies, and seen much self-defeating action.

Before, I had the aspiration to get to the top to use their wide-reaching influence to change things. In some ways, this was a bit misguided.

There is much power in taking full ownership and initiative, and in creating something new. This is what I am doing now. I am finding and curating the Best, Strongest and Most Confident music artists - music artists who don't give a f*#$ and are willing to break boundaries and tear things down, all because they are inalienably BOSS.

I am finding people who have more confidence than artists like Rick Ross, and have more confidence than almost all in the industry. People who are willing to say anything and be the best.

I have been lied to a lot and misguided a lot. It's time to find and make greats.

I had been sucked into association with a bunch of fake idiots who were pretending to be Drake's crew (fake O.V.O., fake X.O.), coupled with a fake contract listing Drake's House, and a whole range of other pathetic behavior. These people do one too many drugs, and here is me, being sober and clean as always. And I'm a non-judgmental man, I don't mind if people pop one too many pills, or do pills at all for that matter, but I'm not going to be lied to by those who aren't doing anything creative or fresh or constructive with their time, and are basically nobodies. And I mingled with such in spite of mistreatment to get to the light at the end of the tunnel, my only goal here was to influence culture, to be a positive influence. So after having had money stolen from me, now I am here, and I am starting this new venture. And it turns out you don't need to be at the top of the rap game to influence. You just gotta put yourself out there. And be confident. And I had the idea that to make a difference you would have to be at the top. And that can work, but grassroots also works, you can Start From The Bottom, and get High Up. I want to try both approaches at the speed of light - and waste as little time as possible. I don't give a damn if people do perks, weed, lean, anything. I don't do it, I don't judge. I am too busy to judge.

My solution is Full Initiative - Full Ownership, a New Label.

It's time to get things started.

Welcome to Wide Discourse Sound.

We are finding select rappers who have it. Rappers who know they're the shit, who know they can say anything, who are mad bosses and know it.

We are finding rappers who aren't afraid to talk about things that most don't talk about, because they're too weak. Things like Scientology.

Huge topic, something to be down to the ground, down to earth about.

We want rappers who are unencumbered by peer pressure or groups telling them what to be, or what to think.

Now, a lot of the biggest rappers can talk about this stuff - what's the issue here?

The issue here is there's tons of based, true shit in this.

And there is so much sanctimony and idiocy on discussion of this. The solution is not to discuss, but be dominated by rappers who know they are the shit. Because when you hear them you'll know it.

People stronger than Rick Ross, Wiz Khalifa, etc., who exude confidence as part of their being.

Rappers like Rick Ross somewhat get it, that's why there is already some music on this (see below) in the mainstream to some extent.

But a true boss would go into the depth of it, into feelings and get what there is. There would be no fake LA nonsense here.

Needless to say, those who are able to speak are more boss than those who can't, who are confused.

Is confusion a dominant state? No.

Is being controlled by a group a dominant state? No.

Is erratic lunacy a dominant state? No.

So anyone who is reserved on this is not boss.

One of the reasons why hip-hop has resonated with so many people and so broadly taken over popular music and discourse is because it is humble, not self-righteous and appeals to a very broad crowd. There is a low-key aspect that is easy to consume, it is not trying to tell you how to live or subject someone to a lower role.

I am trying to broaden the range of discourse by creating more meaningful music. That might sound like buzzwords, but I mean - I want to incorporate ideas from different sources and do novel and edgy things lyrically. The issue with people is they are too uptight, if one introduced influences from say Scientology, not only would that lead to really interesting new music creations which could be a really positive thing for different artists' careers, it could also lead to fake controversy, which would attract attention and let's be real it would sell. So from a business perspective, this is a really good and unique idea, and from a moral standpoint (free speech, learning new things about different cultures, making people less uptight, pushing norms), this is great as well.

Charli D'Amelio did just fine, as did Drake, and Kanye (I'm thinking “Energy” and “Clique” respectively), and Rick Ross (who had a song called Scientology even though he's not a Scientologist) did well, and of course this has worked well for Skrillex.

But these guys don't have meaningful music in this way, and that's where I can assist with this - and in turn, lead to a hell of a lot of good things including increased profits.

Controversy sells and attracts attention = more revenue for artists signed to labels and for producers = virality = greater career prospects for all involved

Meaningfulness, sells.

Substance and defiantness, sells.

Hip-hop and R&B, sells.

Down to earthness and humbleness, sells.

People need to become less sanctimonious/self-righteous, more intelligent, and more exploratory (culturally, lyrically, hell, even scientifically).

• Tap into so-called controversy.


• Artist should seem like independent powerful agent of his own - any time there is some area of sanctimony or one feels like they can't talk about this, break it.


• Producers collaborate with rappers to bring this about. I created software that can help generate meaningful music, all without the use of any AI (hand-crafted code and software by me) - such could contribute in part to a lyrical basis or inspiration for rappers.

Our focus is rap, R&B, pop and electronic.

We will find and sign music artists of these popular genres to our label.

Mission Statement: To find and sign confident music artists to our record label to Widen the Discourse and produce powerful music.

Vision: A music scene where rappers and music artists can rap about any topic, without having to respect the status quo.

The particular logistics of Research and Planning, Legal Structure, Business Plan Creation, Branding, Team Building, Artist Signing, Distribution, Marketing and Promotion, Networking and Financial Management are being worked out as we speak.

↑ Top